Dshenberger wrote:Haha! No worries Mike! :)
I think we should all work together, and come up with a test for Pavel!!
Now there's a good idea... but we would be hard up to come up with as good a prize. I wonder if Pavel might remember the magical number of the hurricane which destroyed PPP in Halifax a couple of years ago? But this is too easy for the quizz master, himself.
I'm becoming so distracted that my daily work is falling behind ... :roll:
I have to confess I have finally done the google search ... has anyone else?
There are so many magic numbers out there that this quizz could be the quizz to end all quizzes.
For Example:
Sunday River (as all resorts) have a magic number in temperature which signals to turn on the snow guns, the number of turns the legs can take before a rest is considered a "magic" number, 20 is thought to be the magic mumber for the number of times to run Birkebeiner to calim "membership" in an elite club, 74 mph is a magic number when speaking of hurricanes ... and the list goes on and on .
So what exactly numbers make the skis "magical"? That is the question.
The ski length and specifications as related to the skier and conditions make them magical.
How the ski is tuned and maintained make them magical.
The cost of the ski certainly must add to the magic and therefore the time to purchase brings about this magic.
The entire skiing experience is magical and is enhanced by the magical ski.
But "its all about the ski".
So let's try to put the numbers into these thoughts.
165 = ski length and 11 meters= ski turning radius
-5C= the temperature which I like when we "allow" the skis to run magically with the suitable waxes for the conditions for the ski base type.
0 degrees base bevel and 2 side bevel for solid grip.
20 the magic number of turns the ski let's us enjoy (depending on terrain and our ability).
And, again 4= April ... the best time to buy and save $$$ for the magical experience.
But I expect I will have a headache from banging my forehead as Pavel suggests, when the answer is revealed. It will be simpler than any of our answers so far.
We are thinking too far within "the box" but at the same time I've spiralled so far away from the target !!!
Ahhh, what frustration ... no, no , I mean what fun !!!
MIke
:( :wink: