Trencher wrote:
No need for wide skis then :lol:
Trencher
I'm in full agreement, and I don't own any :D
Started by LJ in Ski Hardware 16-Dec-2008 - 28 Replies
Bandit
reply to 'Shorter skis' posted Dec-2008
Trencher wrote:
No need for wide skis then :lol:
Trencher
Ise
reply to 'Shorter skis' posted Dec-2008
Trencher wrote:bandit wrote:
Trencher, we're european skiers. We ski everything on anything :D
Here's a good example, ise, well off piste in spring snow, usig his Stockli Laser SC Masters' slalom skis....
No need for wide skis then :lol:
Trencher
Chuffy
reply to 'Shorter skis' posted Dec-2008
frostbite wrote:Chuffy
How did you get on with those Revel 8's ?
Have a pair of Head Big Easy 94's & am debating whether to 'upgrade' to something like Revel 8's ............although the heads do have a wood core, a decent releasable binding so aren't totally rubbish.
LJ
As Chuffy says, the short skiboards ( or whatever you want to call them) make carving and everything else 'easy' compared to 'traditional' length skis. Admittedly they are not going to be as stable at high speed but most likely stable enough for most users. Also, not having to mess with poles makes life loads easier.
Good luck
PS; if anyone wants to take issue with my post, please be gentle as I,m a j2ski forum newbie
Frostbite
reply to 'Shorter skis' posted Dec-2008
Chuffy
reply to 'Shorter skis' posted Dec-2008
frostbite wrote:Chuffy
The Heads have 8 holes I,m afraid......come fitted with the tyrolia SP100 retal binding...which are ultra easy & quick to adjust to various boot sizes + no tools needed ( unless you are changing din setting, when you need a flat edge).
Taking them for a warm up at the MK snowdome either Fri or Sat before heading to Italy on the 17th..have got some zardoz notwax to try out...should keep things nice & slippy :D
Do you use release or non-release bindings?
Topic last updated on 31-December-2008 at 18:02