Söll, Saalbach, Mayrhofen or Ischgl in Feb 2010???
Started by Crossor in Austria 06-Dec-2009 - 101 Replies
EmmaEvs
reply to 'Söll, Saalbach, Mayrhofen or Ischgl in Feb 2010???' posted Dec-2010
Ian Wickham
reply to 'Söll, Saalbach, Mayrhofen or Ischgl in Feb 2010???' posted Dec-2010
EmmaEvs wrote:Nah OldAndy. Only the people who like France anyway can understand him :lol: I did GCSE French and haven't got a clue what he said. I bet he typed it into Google translate :lol:
Your absolutely right, me no speaka l'lingo :shock:
Ian Wickham
reply to 'Söll, Saalbach, Mayrhofen or Ischgl in Feb 2010???' posted Dec-2010
Scarlet Fez wrote:I can safely say that for me Austria ticks all the boxes. Skiing is great, but you can eat drink and be merry and not fear a bank loan is desired. Used to summer holiday in France when kids were younger but it just prices itself out of contention when you want to eat and drink out. Dread to think ski resorts charge to partake in the holiday necessities.
I have heard that the Austrian Riviera is nice 8)
OldAndy
reply to 'Söll, Saalbach, Mayrhofen or Ischgl in Feb 2010???' posted Dec-2010
Ian Wickham wrote:EmmaEvs wrote:Nah OldAndy. Only the people who like France anyway can understand him :lol: I did GCSE French and haven't got a clue what he said. I bet he typed it into Google translate :lol:
Your absolutely right, me no speaka l'lingo :shock:
Ian - I am fairly sure that language is feminine so it would be la lingo and not l'lingo.
:roll:
Tony_H
reply to 'Söll, Saalbach, Mayrhofen or Ischgl in Feb 2010???' posted Dec-2010
I speak from experience in places like Mayrhofen and Niederau. Unfortunately for N, it doesnt go too much higher, but at least M has high altitude slopes but the resort at 690m is often dry.Ian Wickham wrote:
The one thing that turns me off the whole Austrian experience is that they struggle with resort level snow.
But its like anywhere, if you stop high up, you'll get snow, generally. St Anton, for example. I think the difference is Austria has old traditional towns and villages lower down as a base, whereas France has a lot more purpose built resorts at altitude where ski in ski out is more normal.
As for the food, I like Austrian cuisine. Wholesome, wintery, and good value. France does over price it drastically, sadly, and that is a fact.
Ian Wickham
reply to 'Söll, Saalbach, Mayrhofen or Ischgl in Feb 2010???' posted Dec-2010
Tony_H wrote:I speak from experience in places like Mayrhofen and Niederau. Unfortunately for N, it doesnt go too much higher, but at least M has high altitude slopes but the resort at 690m is often dry.Ian Wickham wrote:
The one thing that turns me off the whole Austrian experience is that they struggle with resort level snow.
But its like anywhere, if you stop high up, you'll get snow, generally. St Anton, for example. I think the difference is Austria has old traditional towns and villages lower down as a base, whereas France has a lot more purpose built resorts at altitude where ski in ski out is more normal.
As for the food, I like Austrian cuisine. Wholesome, wintery, and good value. France does over price it drastically, sadly, and that is a fact.
Quality Costs
EmmaEvs
reply to 'Söll, Saalbach, Mayrhofen or Ischgl in Feb 2010???' posted Dec-2010
Ian Wickham
reply to 'Söll, Saalbach, Mayrhofen or Ischgl in Feb 2010???' posted Dec-2010
France is expensive but you can manage that by resort selection it does not have to be wallet busting experience, but I suppose my favourite place to ski would be Italy, nice people, excellent food and normally excellent snow.
Remember just because someone disagrees with your opinion does not mean they are winding you up :wink: :wink: :wink:
Topic last updated on 03-December-2010 at 22:07