Tony_H wrote:There is no connection at all between helmets for skiing and for motorbikes.
Bikers ride dangerous machines at breakneck speeds generally, and often recklessly - very recklessly. They are doing 70mph plus an often well over 100mph on the main roads, so they know the risks. They will also fall onto hard tarmac or concrete or probably through the front window of a car if they crash, which probably means a helmet for them is actually useless anyway.
But the 2 things are totally incomparable.
Just my view though.
You totally miss the point, it is not whether Motor Cycles travel faster, or cyclist ride at breakneck speeds (the vast majority of motorcycle accidents are as a result of a car pulling into the path of a motorcyclist travelling within the speed limit in a town or city) it is whether or not the number of accidents is increasing. The number of skiing accidents is increasing and the number of severe head injuries is increasing, these are indisputable facts, there will come a point in time when the number of injuries is is seen to be unacceptable and change will then occur and it will cease to be a personal choice whether to wear a helmet or not. Your final statement is completely wrong, the situations are totally comparable and the end result will be the same, it is just a matter of time. (The time will be shortened if resorts are shown to be negligent).
One other thing that might shorten the time period is collateral incidents relating to safety; a stray board taking out a child because the board was not tethered will lead to checks on the lifts that will reveal that it was not being enforced that boards are tethered which leads to a multi million dollar law suit.
If you have some cash to spare you could do worse than invest in manfacturers of ski helmets! Its only a matter of time.