The point Bandit was making, albeit a little mischievously (there was a smiley), is that it is a part of that intermediate phase in our skiing to tend to judge a resort by the mileage available.
Personally I wouldn't agree that being a "good" skier and being an intermediate are at all incompatible - but that all goes back to the other thread about what makes a "good" skier...
This thread is about skiing in
Niederau and the questions regarding the perceived "lack" of mileage there. In that context, it's fair to say that mileage would be a concern mostly to intermediate skiers. If you're at that point where you can ski confidently and moderately fast on-piste, but are unhappy off the piste, then you might
expect to find the skiing limited.
But mileage misses the point on so many levels - it tells you nothing about the terrain, the steeps or the secret stashes... :wink:
Dave Mac's quite clearly got many miles on most of us - and loves Niederau. Jan too. Once you've got the miles under your skis, your focus moves on to quality, instead of quantity.
I remember seeing a dozen-strong group of instructors / guides in
Champoluc, on a big powder day, struggling for a couple of hours up a ridge above one particular big, steep pitch. You could hear them whooping and yelling from miles off when they finally dropped in, one by one. A few precious minutes later they were all giving each other "high fives" back on the piste. Then they clawed their way back up, did it once more and went off for a long, late lunch.
My mate and I probably skiied twenty times the distance that day - but they'd had ten times the buzz.
That's not all to say you need to be hardcore to enjoy Niederau - you clearly don't (from the comments I've read on here), but it's obviously got something to offer.
You just need to open your mind and think beyond mileage. The smallest of resorts can give the most memorable of days - seek them out. 8)