bennyboy wrote:Trencher i'm just quoting what some of Canada's top skiers and the CSIA say. if there was no need for poles, why would they even have been put into skiing?
Well, I remember reading about Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in
Davos (credited with introducing alpine skiing to the Brits). They used a long single pole to push themselves along ala a punt on a river.I think they also used it as a rudder (a brake on one side). My guess is that two poles then made more sense for pushing yourself along on the flats. Now you've got these two poles in your hands, what do you do with them when going down hill ? Bearing in mind that skis consisted of two planks of wood with a point on the end that would be very hard to turn, Someone discovered that you could aid turning by planting a pole and pivoting around it. Basically, it again works as a brake.
Then as skiing progressed and skis became more turn friendly, other things were thought up to make use of the poles that had been needed for the flats.
The primary reason for poles is still to push yourself around. If I go touring or do powder on skis, then I would always take poles.
If snowboarding had evolved before skiing and the first skis were like this years models with young people only using them, no one would be using poles on piste.
When I'm a very old man who can't get up after a fall on the flat without the use of a pole, I may start using them on piste. Until then I don't need to carry around a crutch )
Trencher